Guide

Planned vs recorded vs reviewed: checking road survey coverage

Why one coverage percentage misleads, the four coverage states to report instead, dual carriageways and repeat passes, and how to build a resurvey list.

Updated 29 October 20266 min read

Short answer: Survey coverage should be reported as separate states for each section of the planned scope: travelled (the GPS shows the vehicle drove it), usable footage (clear, in-scope video exists), explicitly reviewed (a person marked it reviewed), and observation confirmed (findings were saved). Combining these into one percentage hides gaps. Missing or unusable sections should become a resurvey list with section IDs and direction.

Why one percentage misleads

A vehicle can drive 100% of a corridor while the camera faced the sun, rain covered the lens, or the GPS dropped out under a flyover. A reviewer may then watch only part of the footage. If all of that is reported as “96% covered”, the client cannot tell which sections were actually inspected.

The four coverage states

Survey coverage states
StateMeaningTypical cause of gaps
TravelledThe GPS track passes along the sectionWrong turn, missed section, GPS outage
Usable footageClear, in-scope video exists for the sectionNight, rain, glare, camera off
Explicitly reviewedA reviewer deliberately marked the range as reviewedReview not finished
Observation confirmedFindings or observations were saved for the sectionNo defects present, or not yet recorded

Watching playback alone should never count as “reviewed”. In RouteLens, reviewing is a deliberate action on a range.

Dual carriageways, loops and repeat passes

Coverage matching has to be direction-aware. A divided highway has two carriageways that must each be covered; a pass in the opposite direction does not cover the other side. Loops, crossings and parallel service roads can also confuse simple distance checks. Repeat passes and overlapping recording chapters should not be counted twice.

Building the resurvey list

  1. Import the assigned scope as sections with IDs and direction.
  2. Run coverage against the recordings.
  3. List sections that were not travelled or have no usable footage.
  4. Export a gap and resurvey CSV for the field team, with section IDs and direction.
  5. Record reviewer exceptions, such as sections excluded by the client, in the run.

What to hand the client

A summary with the scope, exclusions, thresholds and the four totals with their definitions; a section table; the gap list; and a readable coverage report. RouteLens produces all four from a saved coverage run.

Questions

What is survey coverage?

The share of the planned survey scope that was travelled, has usable footage, was explicitly reviewed and has confirmed observations, reported per section.

Does watching the video count as reviewed?

No. Reviewed should be a deliberate reviewer action on a range, so playback alone is never counted.

How do I handle both directions of a highway?

Treat each carriageway and direction as its own scope sections and use direction-aware matching, so one direction never covers the other.

RouteLens is built by UGAC. Where this guide describes RouteLens behaviour, it reflects the release status published on 29 October 2026; see the product overview for what is verified.

Next step

See RouteLens on your own footage.

Book a 30-minute walkthrough. Bring a recording and a sample report, and we will show you the map, video, findings and coverage working together.

Book a demo